![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
This is a discussion on The 11th unit within the Training Room forums, part of the Tactics Headquarters category; I've always thought of how adding 1 more potential unit could change the gameplay entirely. I usually think of this ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Semi-Retired
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 715
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 11th unit
I've always thought of how adding 1 more potential unit could change the gameplay entirely. I usually think of this when I'm making a new set, and just that extra needed 11th unit placed in that exact spot would make the form perfect, but alas, 10 unit max. = = "
So what are your thoughts on this? Would it make rushes more powerful (better clerickill on both sides)? Turtles easier to defend (extra furgon)? harder to? Freezers less powerful (more units to freeze, defocus)? Bombs more effective (spread damage, more likely chance of units clumped)? Would it even make a difference at all? I do understand that if you get an extra unit, your opponent gets an extra unit. So 1 for 1 unit addition, why would it make a difference? Well ask yourself if a 9 vs. 9 unit game is any different than a 10 vs. 10 unit game? How about an 8 vs. 8, 4 vs. 4? The effects of some units increase as number of units left on the playing field decrease (frost, enchant, furgon). Wouldn't some units' effects decrease/increase as number of units increase? Its a bit of an exaggeration, but it gets the message through. Also, 1 unit can change the entire strategy, such as a furgon, dsm, stone. Although there are inherent potholes in this logic, try to look past that and input in your tactical/strategic opinions. Maybe even post some your sets before (10 units) and after (add 1 more unit), and see how much better it can be. Example: 10 units ![]() 11 units ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Spreading Disease's
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Look Under Your Girl's Dress :)
Posts: 1,750
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
im not so sure on this idea. it seems good but it will just make the game longer.
__________________
time is a waste of life, Life is a waste of time, Get hammered all the time And have the time of your life. | Become A Charter Member| |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
No kitty at all -_-
Join Date: May 2007
Location: where i can watch U
Posts: 416
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, i often had the thought: damn, one more unit and the form would be perfect...
But at the same time, i think: Theres a reason theres 10 units, you have to choose, which unit you dont take, and therefore leave your form a flaw... Of course, if the opponnent, would also have 11 units... Anyways, i think its good with 10, a possibility to play with more wouldnt hurt though, but absolutely change the gameplay, i guess..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 755
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
And this should be in suggestions to improve TAO
__________________
My wins thread ![]() Thx ~Supernatural~ for the sig There are 2 things you need to know to be succesful in life. 1) Don't tell anyone everything you know 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Strategic Insomnipwners!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: England!
Posts: 5,484
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
When I made a formation and I had my 3 knights, 1 cleric, scout, furgon, LW and 3 frosts I thought my formation was perfect. But then I realized that I forgot the mud. With 11 units my set would actually be perfect.
But on the other hand your opponent has 11 units. So that means he would use Mask's rush with a witch on either side which would make that also a beast of a set. So, with 11 units I bet everyone could make their set 'perfect' but realistically it would just be the same as 10 vs 10. Hmm, but then again, in grey games there isn't much range so frosts would become a lot more powerful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Co Leadεr of 110th
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 288
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i agree the 11th unit would be nice and all but at the same it would
make games longer and i think less fun and then stone set would become over powerd another problem is what would they do with the default set add a barrier infront of the healer to give LOS blockage be able to shield all the units at the start
__________________
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Retired
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Netcave
Posts: 5,954
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Holy. Lord.
The whole game would have to re-balanced so people could not find a "perfect" set. I.E. good turtles would become Great turtles with the use of a furgon which may not have been allowed there in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Peanut Butter Jelly Time
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada, Toronto
Posts: 1,967
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Whenever somebody is making a set, they always end up saying "only if i had one more unit then it could be perfect". TAO limits the strategy on 10 units. 11 units would make far too complicated and possibly allow people to create the perfect set.
__________________
![]() Thanks to Jimmy for this awesome banner! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Unit on unit damage | MBurns | Help Forum | 2 | 02-21-2007 02:58 AM |
| My 4th Attempt In Making A Unit - Super Death Unit Rampage Activate | Canada | Junk Units | 21 | 01-05-2007 04:41 PM |
| Not even a unit, so it isn't even a junk unit. ; | dark_immortal | Junk | 10 | 10-01-2006 10:20 PM |
| Blank Unit (A Unit Designed by the General Public of TAO) | Prayer | Create-A-Unit | 34 | 09-26-2006 07:39 PM |
| XCI looking unit and a Cyborge looking unit. just read it!!! | KRITIKAL | Junk Units | 11 | 09-08-2005 01:44 AM |